Knoll v. Linardy
43 So. 2d 857, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1204
Opinions
The decree appealed from should be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
TERRELL, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, SEBRING and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
ADAMS, C.J., and ROBERTS, J., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Knoll v. Linardy, 43 So. 2d 857, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1204 (Fla. 1949).
43 So. 2d 857 (Knoll v. Linardy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Gibbs v. Couch
190 So. 723 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Stewart v. New Smyrna Inlet District
130 So. 575 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Riley v. Holmer
131 So. 330 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Pitt v. Belate Ironmonger
146 So. 380 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Williams Ex Rel. Summerlin v. Ricou
196 So. 667 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Chavous v. Goodbread
23 So. 2d 761 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)
Stewart v. New Smyrna-Coronado Beach Special Road & Bridge District
132 So. 864 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Standard Kaolin Co. v. Special Road & Bridge District No. 13
132 So. 636 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
State ex rel. Lamar v. Dillon
32 Fla. 545 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1893)