Knoll v. Cape Cod Sea Food Restaurant, Ltd.

324 N.E.2d 368, 35 N.Y.2d 917, 364 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1078
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 20, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 324 N.E.2d 368 (Knoll v. Cape Cod Sea Food Restaurant, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knoll v. Cape Cod Sea Food Restaurant, Ltd., 324 N.E.2d 368, 35 N.Y.2d 917, 364 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1078 (N.Y. 1974).

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Following an adjudication that he failed to prove performance of an express contract both valid and enforceable, a party may not disregard such contract and recover in a separate cause of action for quantum meruit (Foster v. White & Sons, 244 App. Div. 368, affd. 270 N. Y. 572; see, also, 50 N. Y. Jur., Restitution, § 105).

Ohief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Oabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Stevens concur ; Judge Rabin taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knoll v. CAPE COD SEA FOOD REST., LTD.
324 N.E.2d 368 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
324 N.E.2d 368, 35 N.Y.2d 917, 364 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knoll-v-cape-cod-sea-food-restaurant-ltd-ny-1974.