Knoll v. Cape Cod Sea Food Restaurant, Ltd.

324 N.E.2d 368, 35 N.Y.2d 917, 364 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1078
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 1974·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Following an adjudication that he failed to prove performance of an express contract both valid and enforceable, a party may not disregard such contract and recover in a separate cause of action for quantum meruit (Foster v. White & Sons, 244 App. Div. 368, affd. 270 N. Y. 572; see, also, 50 N. Y. Jur., Restitution, § 105).

Ohief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Oabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Stevens concur ; Judge Rabin taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knoll v. Cape Cod Sea Food Restaurant, Ltd., 324 N.E.2d 368, 35 N.Y.2d 917, 364 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1078 (N.Y. 1974).

324 N.E.2d 368 (Knoll v. Cape Cod Sea Food Restaurant, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knoll v. CAPE COD SEA FOOD REST., LTD.
324 N.E.2d 368 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)