Knoll v. Blanchard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Knoll v. Blanchard

164 N.W. 992, 138 Minn. 476, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 963

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 2, 1917

DocketNo. 20,489

StatusPublished

This text of 164 N.W. 992 (Knoll v. Blanchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knoll v. Blanchard, 164 N.W. 992, 138 Minn. 476, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 963 (Mich. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On January 9, 1917, judgment was entered by default against defendants, in the municipal court of the city of, St. Paul. February 6, the court, upon motion vacated’ the judgment and permitted defendants to file an answer, and set the case for trial on June 18, 1917. The defendant, Adelia F. Blanchard, claimed that the summons was never served upon her and offered proof to that effect.

The trial court acted within its discretion and the order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On January 9, 1917, judgment was entered by default against defendants, in the municipal court of the city of, St. Paul. February 6, the court, upon motion vacated’ the judgment and permitted defendants to file an answer, and set the case for trial on June 18, 1917. The defendant, Adelia F. Blanchard, claimed that the summons was never served upon her and offered proof to that effect.

The trial court acted within its discretion and the order appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 N.W. 992, 138 Minn. 476, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knoll-v-blanchard-minn-1917.