Knoell v. Jordan
This text of 68 N.J.L. 605 (Knoell v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This certiorari brings np a judgment rendered in-the District Court of the city of Camden. The reasons assigned for reversal relate exclusively to the proceedings at the trial, and the only evidence of those proceedings laid before us is a stipulation signed by the attorneys of- -the parties.
It is our settled practice not to regard such a stipulation in cases of this character. Monitor Lodge v. Goldy, 29 Vroom 119; Houman v. Schulster, 31 Id. 132; Staten Chemical Co. v. Miller, 29 Atl. Rep. 316.
As we find no support for the reasons assigned, the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 N.J.L. 605, 1902 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knoell-v-jordan-nj-1902.