Knoedler v. Schell
14 F. Cas. 782, 17 Leg. Int. 373
This text of 14 F. Cas. 782 (Knoedler v. Schell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Knoedler v. Schell, 14 F. Cas. 782, 17 Leg. Int. 373 (circtsdny 1860).
Opinion
ruled that there was no authority for the exaction of more than 8 per cent, duty, and the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict for the excess paid in both actions.
[A motion was subsequently made in this case to set aside an execution against the personal effects of the collector. The motion was overruled. Case No. 7,889.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
14 F. Cas. 782, 17 Leg. Int. 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knoedler-v-schell-circtsdny-1860.