Knittel v. Franklin Credit Management Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Knittel v. Franklin Credit Management Corp.

380 S.W.3d 8, 2012 WL 2107964, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 797

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2012·No. No. ED 97576·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Franklin Credit Management Corporation (“FCM”) appeals the judgment of the trial court denying its motion to set aside the default judgment entered against it in Frieda Knittel’s action to quiet title. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying FCM’s motion to set aside the default judgment. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Franklin Credit Management Corporation (“FCM”) appeals the judgment of the trial court denying its motion to set aside the default judgment entered against it in Frieda Knittel’s action to quiet title. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying FCM’s motion to set aside the default judgment. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Knittel v. Franklin Credit Management Corp., 380 S.W.3d 8, 2012 WL 2107964, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 797 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

380 S.W.3d 8 (Knittel v. Franklin Credit Management Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.