Kniskern v. Somerford Twp.

674 N.E.2d 1187, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1549, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 400, 1997 WL 30788
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 29, 1997
Docket96-1861
StatusPublished

This text of 674 N.E.2d 1187 (Kniskern v. Somerford Twp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kniskern v. Somerford Twp., 674 N.E.2d 1187, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1549, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 400, 1997 WL 30788 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

Franklin App. Nos. 95API09-1164 and 95API09-1169. Reported at 77 Ohio St.3d 1485, 673 N.E.2d 145. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 N.E.2d 1187, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1549, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 400, 1997 WL 30788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kniskern-v-somerford-twp-ohio-1997.