Knipe v. Harrington
This text of 1 Blackf. 79 (Knipe v. Harrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The award in this case, should have been returned to the Circuit Court, at the September term, 1819, which was the time limited for that purpose by the bonds of submission. No return was then made; nor does any consent appear to have been given for an enlargement of the time. This entire disregard of the subject at the proper time, prevents the party from deriving any benefit from the award subsequently re' turned
The judgment on the award in this case is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded for further proceedings.
Vide Mitts v. Conner, in this Court, ante, p. 7.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Blackf. 79, 1820 Ind. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knipe-v-harrington-ind-1820.