Knightstown & Shelbyville Railroad v. Lindsay

Indiana Supreme Court

Knightstown & Shelbyville Railroad v. Lindsay

8 Ind. 278

DecidedDecember 5, 1856

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ind. 278 (Knightstown & Shelbyville Railroad v. Lindsay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knightstown & Shelbyville Railroad v. Lindsay, 8 Ind. 278 (Ind. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

"We have heretofore decided that section 3, of an act approved May the 11th, 1852, upon which this suit is founded, has been virtually repealed by section 784 of an act approved June the 18th, 1852. 1 R. S. p. 426. — 2 id. p. 205. — Peru and Indianapolis Railroad Company v. Bradshaw, 6 Ind. R. 146.

Upon the authority of the case just cited, the judgment of the Circuit Court in the case before us must be reversed.

The judgment is reversed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

"We have heretofore decided that section 3, of an act approved May the 11th, 1852, upon which this suit is founded, has been virtually repealed by section 784 of an act approved June the 18th, 1852. 1 R. S. p. 426. — 2 id. p. 205. — Peru and Indianapolis Railroad Company v. Bradshaw, 6 Ind. R. 146.

Upon the authority of the case just cited, the judgment of the Circuit Court in the case before us must be reversed.

The judgment is reversed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Ind. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knightstown-shelbyville-railroad-v-lindsay-ind-1856.