Knights v. Stihl Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Knights v. Stihl Inc.

417 F. App'x 356

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 17, 2011·No. No. 10-2118·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Knights appeals the district court’s final order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Knights v. Stihl Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00260-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2010; Aug. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Knights appeals the district court’s final order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Knights v. Stihl Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00260-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2010; Aug. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Knights v. Stihl Inc., 417 F. App'x 356 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

417 F. App'x 356 (Knights v. Stihl Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related