Knights v. Oxford Global Resources

Fourth Circuit

Knights v. Oxford Global Resources

560 F. App'x 169

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 7, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2045

StatusPublished

This text of 560 F. App'x 169 (Knights v. Oxford Global Resources) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knights v. Oxford Global Resources, 560 F. App'x 169 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Knights appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to reopen his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Knights v. Stihl Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00260-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. July 26, 2013). We grant Knights leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Knights appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to reopen his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Knights v. Stihl Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00260-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. July 26, 2013). We grant Knights leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

560 F. App'x 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knights-v-oxford-global-resources-ca4-2014.