Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. Commonwealth ex rel. State Corp. Commission

122 S.E. 122, 138 Va. 500, 1924 Va. LEXIS 41
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided March 20, 1924·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Prentis, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Whether or not the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, a corporation chartered under the laws of the State of' Georgia, is required to comply with the statutes applicable to foreign corporations desiring to do business or exercise their corporate functions in this State, is the question here involved. The corporation has been fined under Code, section 3848, for failure to comply with the provisions of Code, section 3847, both of which are printed in the margin.* In this connection it is proper also to consider this pertinent part of section 163 of the Constitution, also in the margin.

[503] Section 3848-a makes it unlawful for a foreign corporation to “transact any business in this State” or to offer •or advertise to do so, without first complying with these statutes.

It seems to us that the mere recital of the fact that the appellant is a Georgia corporation is sufficient to sustain the conclusion of the Commission, for the language of the inhibiting statutes seems too plain to require any interpretation. The Constitution precludes foreign corporations from exercising their functions in this State, except upon compliance with the laws of the State, and expressly authorizes the General Assembly to discriminate against foreign corporations if it is deemed expedient. That the General Assembly may exclude foreign corporations from exercising their corporate functions within this State, subject only to [504] the inhibitions of the Federal Constitution, is everywhere conceded. It is claimed here, however, by the appellant, that the State has neither exercised this undoubted power nor imposed any conditions or restrictions upon corporations of this class, and the supporting argument is chiefly based upon the contention that the words “doing business” cannot be applied to a corporation which claims to be organized for patriotic and benevolent purposes.

It is agreed that this appeal shall be determined by a consideration of the charter and the facts which are thus recited:

“The Knights of the Ku Klux Klan isoa foreign corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Georgia, without capital stock. Its purposes are stated to be patriotic, secret, social and benevolent. It [505] is apparently well organized to secure new members and establish local Klans. Operations were begun in Virginia about September, 1920, and solicitors have.succeeded in establishing possibly fifty-four local organizations within this State, charging an admission or initiation fee of $10.00 to each individuad member, admitted. No part of this sum, it is stated, goes into the treasury of a local Klan, but $4.00 is paid to the King Kleagle or State organizer; fifty cents to the Grand Goblin or organizer in charge of several States; $2.50 to the Imperial Kleagle at the head of propagation and organization work, and the remaining $2.00 to the treasury of the national organization in Atlanta.
“Members received into the order were required to equip themselves with paraphernalia, including a robe and hood furnished from the office of the Imperial Wizard irC Atlanta, for which a charge was made in the sum of $6.50 each. Order blanks provided .that the robe and hood remain the property of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan and upon surrender the money was to be returned.
[506] “Upon at least one occasion, according to the'evidence, robes and hoods were furnished to new members, upon their initiation at the organization of a local Klan,. said articles being already on hand in this State and sold. and delivered at the time.
“The defendant exhibited a measurement blank on which orders for robes were to be sent to Atlanta and. there filed by the Atlanta organization. The witness-also testified that -this was the usual way of ordering or-procuring robes for any Klan.”

And the petition recites that:

“The charter of the corporation provides, inter aliar. that ‘the purpose and object of said corporation is to-be purely benevolent and eleemosynary, and there shall be no capital stock or profit or gain to the members thereof.’ ”

And in paragraph 4 is the following provision: “The-petitioners desire that the society shall have the power-to confer an initiation degree ritualism, fraternal and. secret obligations,, words, grip, signs and ceremonies under which there shall be united only white male persons of sound health, good morals and high character,, and further desire such rights, powers and privileges as-are now extended to the Independent Order of Odd Fellows, Free and Accepted Order of Masons, Knights-of Pythias, et al., under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Georgia.

“Accordingly, the society was incorporated and chartered under the laws of Georgia as ‘a purely benevolent and eleemosynary society, having no capital stock, for-the purpose of conducting a patriotic, secret, social, benevolent order.’

“The society carries no insurance feature whatever- and it is perfectly apparent from the foregoing facts-that the corporation is precisely what it is declared to-be by its charter.”

[507] When the charter was obtained the incorporators did not hesitate to nse the word “business” as defining its •objects, purposes and powers, for section 7 reads thus:

“Petitioners desire that the business of the society shall be under the control of the ‘Imperial Wizard’ (president), who shall be amenable in his official administration to the ‘Imperial Kloncilium’ (supreme •executive committee), a majority of whom shall have authority to act, and a two-thirds majority power to veto the official acts of the ‘Imperial Wizard’ (president) in the matters pertaining to the general welfare of the society, and to contract with other members of the •society for the purpose of promoting and conducting its interests and general welfare, in any way, manner, or method he may deem proper for the society’s progress and stability, subject to the restrictions of the power of the ‘Imperial Wizard’ (president) as is heretofore set forth in this paragraph.”

And section 9 reads thus:

“Petitioners desire the right to own separate unto itself and to control the sale of all paraphernalia, regalia, : stationery, jewelry and such other materials needed by the subordinate branches of the order for the proper conduct of their business; the right to publish a fraternal magazine and such other literature as is needed in the conduct of the business of the order; the right to buy, hold and sell real estate and personal property suitable to the purpose of the said corporation; to sell, exchange or sublease the same or any part thereof; to mortgage or create liens thereon; to borrow money • and secure the payment thereof by mortgage or deed of trust and to appoint trustees in connection therewith; to execute promissory notes, to have and use a common •seal; to sue and be sued; to plead and be impleaded; to do and perform all those things, and exercise all those [508] rights, whieh under the laws of Georgia are conferred, upon societies or orders of like character.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. Commonwealth ex rel. State Corp. Commission, 122 S.E. 122, 138 Va. 500, 1924 Va. LEXIS 41 (Va. 1924).

122 S.E. 122 (Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. Commonwealth ex rel. State Corp. Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bankers Leasing Co. v. Eagle Valley Environmentalists, Inc.
387 N.W.2d 380 (Court of Appeals of Iowa, 1986)
Hitachi Sales Corp. of Am. v. Long
9 Va. Cir. 473 (Roanoke County Circuit Court, 1982)
Continental Properties, Inc. v. Ullman Co.
436 F. Supp. 538 (E.D. Virginia, 1977)
Yonce v. Miners Memorial Hospital Ass'n
161 F. Supp. 178 (W.D. Virginia, 1958)
People v. Jewish Consumptives' Relief Society
196 Misc. 579 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Doherty v. Moreschi
187 Misc. 175 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
American Medical Ass'n v. United States
130 F.2d 233 (D.C. Circuit, 1942)
Labelle v. Hennepin County Bar Assn.
288 N.W. 788 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1939)
Hazen v. National Rifle Ass'n of America
101 F.2d 432 (D.C. Circuit, 1938)
Jardine v. Superior Court
2 P.2d 756 (California Supreme Court, 1931)
State ex rel. Griffith v. Knights of the Ku Klux Klan
232 P. 254 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1925)