Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. Commonwealth ex rel. State Corp. Commission

122 S.E. 122, 138 Va. 500, 1924 Va. LEXIS 41
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided March 20, 1924·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Prentis, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Whether or not the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, a corporation chartered under the laws of the State of' Georgia, is required to comply with the statutes applicable to foreign corporations desiring to do business or exercise their corporate functions in this State, is the question here involved. The corporation has been fined under Code, section 3848, for failure to comply with the provisions of Code, section 3847, both of which are printed in the margin.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. Commonwealth ex rel. State Corp. Commission, 122 S.E. 122, 138 Va. 500, 1924 Va. LEXIS 41 (Va. 1924).

122 S.E. 122 (Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. Commonwealth ex rel. State Corp. Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bankers Leasing Co. v. Eagle Valley Environmentalists, Inc.
387 N.W.2d 380 (Court of Appeals of Iowa, 1986)
Hitachi Sales Corp. of Am. v. Long
9 Va. Cir. 473 (Roanoke County Circuit Court, 1982)
Continental Properties, Inc. v. Ullman Co.
436 F. Supp. 538 (E.D. Virginia, 1977)
Yonce v. Miners Memorial Hospital Ass'n
161 F. Supp. 178 (W.D. Virginia, 1958)
People v. Jewish Consumptives' Relief Society
196 Misc. 579 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Doherty v. Moreschi
187 Misc. 175 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
American Medical Ass'n v. United States
130 F.2d 233 (D.C. Circuit, 1942)
Labelle v. Hennepin County Bar Assn.
288 N.W. 788 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1939)
Hazen v. National Rifle Ass'n of America
101 F.2d 432 (D.C. Circuit, 1938)
Jardine v. Superior Court
2 P.2d 756 (California Supreme Court, 1931)
State ex rel. Griffith v. Knights of the Ku Klux Klan
232 P. 254 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1925)