Knights & Ladies of Honor v. Burke

15 S.W. 45, 4 Willson 234
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 12, 1890
DocketNo. 3518
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 S.W. 45 (Knights & Ladies of Honor v. Burke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knights & Ladies of Honor v. Burke, 15 S.W. 45, 4 Willson 234 (Tex. Ct. App. 1890).

Opinion

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 165. Benefit certificate; voluntary payment; public policy. One Pinson was a member of the order of the Knights & Ladies of Honor, and held two benefit certificates thereon, aggregating $3,000. Appellee, Burke, was the beneficiary in said certificates. Burke had no insurable interest in the life of Pinson. Burke paid dues and assessments for Pinson to the amount of $189.20. Appellant had no notice that Burke, and not Pinson, paid said dues and assessments. Burke ceased to pay dues and assessments for Pinson, and, while Pinson still lived, brought this suit to recover of appellant the said sum of $189.20, paid out as aforesaid. He recovered judgment for said amount in both the justice’s and county court. We are of the opinion that the judgment is wrong. Appellee could not be beneficiary in the certificates, and could not legally claim or recover the insurance upon the death of Pinson. Having no insurable interest in the life of Pinson, public policy would not permit him to be recognized as a beneficiary in said certificates. [Price v. Lodge, 68 Tex. 361.] His payment [235]*235of the dues and assessments for Pinson was an arrangement between Pinson and himself, with which appellant had nothing to do. There was no privity of contract between him and appellant. Appellant was entitled to the amount paid from Pinson, and not. from Burke, but, if Burke saw proper to pay the same for Pinson, he must look to Pinson and not to appellant for reimbursement. The certificates are not void, except as to Burke, but, upon Pinson’s death, would be payable to his heirs. Burke might, in the event of Pinson’s death, have an equitable claim upon the money collected upon the certificates; but this question is not in this case. [Schonfield v. Turner, 75 Tex. 324.]

November 12, 1890.

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holland v. Pyramid Life Ins. Co. Of Little Rock
199 F.2d 926 (Fifth Circuit, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 S.W. 45, 4 Willson 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knights-ladies-of-honor-v-burke-texapp-1890.