Knight & Wall Co. v. Thomas
This text of 92 N.Y.S. 997 (Knight & Wall Co. v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant Thomas appeals from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial from the county of New York to the county of Wayne. The facts set out in the record bearing upon the question of the change of place of trial are precisely the same as in Washington v. Thomas (decided herewith) 92 N. Y. Supp. 994, and for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in that case the order here appealed from must be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, to abide event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 N.Y.S. 997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-wall-co-v-thomas-nyappdiv-1905.