Knight & Wall Co. v. Thomas

92 N.Y.S. 997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McLAUGHLIN, J.

The defendant Thomas appeals from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial from the county of New York to the county of Wayne. The facts set out in the record bearing upon the question of the change of place of trial are precisely the same as in Washington v. Thomas (decided herewith) 92 N. Y. Supp. 994, and for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in that case the order here appealed from must be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, to abide event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight & Wall Co. v. Thomas, 92 N.Y.S. 997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

92 N.Y.S. 997 (Knight & Wall Co. v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Satterwhite v. Harriman Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
13 F. Supp. 493 (S.D. New York, 1935)