Knight v. Ward Paving Co.
This text of 176 So. 2d 900 (Knight v. Ward Paving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 26, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis[901]*901pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. See Miami Beach First National Bank v. Dunn, 85 So.2d 556 (Fla.1956). The petition is therefore denied.
It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees be and the same is hereby denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 So. 2d 900, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-ward-paving-co-fla-1965.