Knight v. Ward Paving Co.

176 So. 2d 900, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3231
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 7, 1965
DocketNo. 34267
StatusPublished

This text of 176 So. 2d 900 (Knight v. Ward Paving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knight v. Ward Paving Co., 176 So. 2d 900, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3231 (Fla. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 26, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis[901]*901pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. See Miami Beach First National Bank v. Dunn, 85 So.2d 556 (Fla.1956). The petition is therefore denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees be and the same is hereby denied.

THORN AL, C. J., and ROBERTS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, TT., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miami Beach First National Bank v. Dunn
85 So. 2d 556 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 So. 2d 900, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-ward-paving-co-fla-1965.