Knight v. Ward Paving Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Knight v. Ward Paving Co.

176 So. 2d 900, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3231

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 7, 1965·No. No. 34267·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 26, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis[901] pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. See Miami Beach First National Bank v. Dunn, 85 So.2d 556 (Fla.1956). The petition is therefore denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees be and the same is hereby denied.

THORN AL, C. J., and ROBERTS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, TT., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 26, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis[901] pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. See Miami Beach First National Bank v. Dunn, 85 So.2d 556 (Fla.1956). The petition is therefore denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees be and the same is hereby denied.

THORN AL, C. J., and ROBERTS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, TT., concur.

Knight v. Ward Paving Co., 176 So. 2d 900, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3231 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

176 So. 2d 900 (Knight v. Ward Paving Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related