Knight v. Vincent

1 Wright 748, 1 Ohio Ch. 748
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1834
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 748 (Knight v. Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knight v. Vincent, 1 Wright 748, 1 Ohio Ch. 748 (Ohio 1834).

Opinion

WRIGHT, J.

The statute makes it the duty of the justice after-judgment to issue execution, unless otherwise directed, if the defendant shall fail to pay or give bond for a stay of execution: (29' O. h. 181.) The law does not require this of the justice after bail, is given, for stay of execution, nor can we suppose it intended by the legislature to make the judge the general agent of whatever parties have judgment before him. If the party entitled to would obtain process, he must sue for it, or demand it of the officer authorized to issue, and if he refuse, he may be liable.

749] *The averment of the demand has no certainty. Whether-the request was made by the plaintiff, or his agent, or by what agent, or when, or where, are all uncertain. The party making the averment is supposed to know the matters set forth and to aver-them with certainty to a common intent. He has not done so. A request of an execution of a justice, when not at his office, though-in the township, unless in writing, would not subject the justice to-suit for neglect.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Wright 748, 1 Ohio Ch. 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-vincent-ohio-1834.