Knight v. Vernon

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Knight v. Vernon. Read the opinion of the Court — 214 F.3d 544
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 28, 2000·No. 98-2514·Published

Opinion

Filed: July 27, 2000

Corrected Order Filed: July 28, 2000

PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2514

(CA-97-755-1)

KATHY W. KNIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

C. D. VERNON, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Rockingham County; ROCKINGHAM COUNTY,

Defendants - Appellees.

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTH CAROLINA LEGAL FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED,

Amicus Curiae.

On Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc

The appellees filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.

Judge Widener voted to grant panel rehearing. Judge Michael and Judge Magill voted to deny.

A member of the Court requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc. The poll failed to produce a majority of the judges in active service in favor of rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Wilkinson, Judge Widener, and Judge Niemeyer voted to rehear the case en banc, and Judge Murnaghan, Judge Wilkins, Judge Luttig, Judge Williams, Judge Michael, Judge Motz, Judge Traxler, and Judge King voted against rehearing en banc.

The Court denies the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.

Entered at the direction of Judge Michael for the Court.

For the Court,

/s/ Patricia S. Connor

CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight v. Vernon, (4th Cir. 2000).

Knight v. Vernon (Knight v. Vernon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.