Knight v. State of Florida

114 So. 665, 94 Fla. 868
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 7, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 114 So. 665 (Knight v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knight v. State of Florida, 114 So. 665, 94 Fla. 868 (Fla. 1927).

Opinion

Ellis, C. J.

Charlie Knight was indicted, tried and convicted for keeping and maintaining a gambling room for the purpose of gaming and gambling. The statute which denounces the offense is Sec. 5499, Revised General Statutes.

A reversal of the judgment is sought upon the grounds that the evidence, which consisted of the events which transpired on a certain night at the house kept by Knight, was not sufficient to convict him of the offense charged, because the element of frequency or repetition of such events transpiring in that house was lacking. The point is duly presented.

The point is not well taken. The judgment should be affirmed. See Ransom v. State, 26 Fla. 364, 7 South. Rep. 860.

*869 Judgment affirmed.

Strum and Brown, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moldorah v. State
195 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Cohen v. State
189 So. 2d 498 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Jacobs v. City of Chariton
65 N.W.2d 561 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 665, 94 Fla. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-state-of-florida-fla-1927.