Knight v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Knight v. State

206 S.W.3d 375, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1753, 2006 WL 3360950

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 21, 2006

DocketNo. ED 87903

StatusPublished

This text of 206 S.W.3d 375 (Knight v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knight v. State, 206 S.W.3d 375, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1753, 2006 WL 3360950 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

[376]*376 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Knight appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his amended Rule 24.035¹ motion to vacate sentence and set aside guilty plea. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Vernor v. State, 894 S.W.2d 209, 210 (Mo.App. E.D.1995). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[376]*376 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Knight appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his amended Rule 24.035¹ motion to vacate sentence and set aside guilty plea. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Vernor v. State, 894 S.W.2d 209, 210 (Mo.App. E.D.1995). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 S.W.3d 375, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1753, 2006 WL 3360950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-state-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack