Knight v. State

206 S.W.3d 375, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1753, 2006 WL 3360950
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 2006·No. No. ED 87903·Published

Opinion

[376] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Knight appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his amended Rule 24.0351 motion to vacate sentence and set aside guilty plea. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Vernor v. State, 894 S.W.2d 209, 210 (Mo.App. E.D.1995). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight v. State, 206 S.W.3d 375, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1753, 2006 WL 3360950 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

206 S.W.3d 375 (Knight v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vernor v. State
894 S.W.2d 209 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995)