Knight v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Knight v. State

109 S.E. 520, 27 Ga. App. 634, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 325

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 17, 1921

Docket12764

StatusPublished

This text of 109 S.E. 520 (Knight v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knight v. State, 109 S.E. 520, 27 Ga. App. 634, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 325 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new t?ial, complaining of the repelling of certain testimony offered by the accused, cannot be considered, as the amendment is not complete and understandable without a reference to other parts of the record.

2. The case was submitted to the judge without the intervention of a jury, and the evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new t?ial, complaining of the repelling of certain testimony offered by the accused, cannot be considered, as the amendment is not complete and understandable without a reference to other parts of the record.

2. The case was submitted to the judge without the intervention of a jury, and the evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 S.E. 520, 27 Ga. App. 634, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-state-gactapp-1921.