Knight v. State

202 So. 3d 906, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14526
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Knight v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20730
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 2016·No. No. 3D15-829·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Knight appeals his convictions and sentences on multiple counts of fraudulent use or possession of personal identification information and one count of unlawful possession of stolen credii/debit cards (Count 22). We remand for the trial court to vacate the conviction and sentence on Count 22, and affirm in all other respects.

The offense charged in Count 22 was not a crime on the date the offense was committed. Based on the state’s proper confession of error, we vacate that conviction and sentence. This makes it unnecessary to address the defendant’s double jeopardy argument.

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight v. State, 202 So. 3d 906, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14526 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

202 So. 3d 906 (Knight v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.