Knight v. State

579 So. 2d 916, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5431, 1991 WL 90969
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Knight v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 559 So. 2d 327
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 30, 1991·No. No. 90-89·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a sentence imposed upon a finding that appellant had violated certain conditions of her probation. Appellee concedes that the sentence exceeded the one-cell guidelines increase authorized by Maxwell v. State, 576 So.2d 367 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) and Sanders v. State, 560 So.2d 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Accordingly, we vacate the departure sentence imposed by the trial court, and remand for resentencing within the guidelines range one-cell increase. As in Maxwell, we certify direct conflict with Williams v. State, 568 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) and Brown v. State, 559 So.2d 412 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

SMITH, NIMMONS and MINER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight v. State, 579 So. 2d 916, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5431, 1991 WL 90969 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

579 So. 2d 916 (Knight v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
568 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Maxwell v. State
576 So. 2d 367 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Sanders v. State
560 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Brown v. State
559 So. 2d 412 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)