Knight v. State

122 So. 924, 23 Ala. App. 648
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 1929·No. 8 Div. 834.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The facts adduced upon the trial of this case in the court below presented a jury question. The court properly so held by refusing to defendant the general affirmative charge requested in writing.

Appellant was convicted for distilling, etc., prohibited liquors and for the possession of a still to be used for that purpose. No erroneous ruling of the court appears, and under all the facts 'we will not disturb the action of the court in overruling motion for a new trial.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight v. State, 122 So. 924, 23 Ala. App. 648 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

122 So. 924 (Knight v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knight v. State
122 So. 918 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)