Knight v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Knight v. State

122 So. 924, 23 Ala. App. 648

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 16, 1929

Docket8 Div. 834.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 122 So. 924 (Knight v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knight v. State, 122 So. 924, 23 Ala. App. 648 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The facts adduced upon the trial of this case in the court below presented a jury question. The court properly so held by refusing to defendant the general affirmative charge requested in writing.

Appellant was convicted for distilling, etc., prohibited liquors and for the possession of a still to be used for that purpose. No erroneous ruling of the court appears, and under all the facts 'we will not disturb the action of the court in overruling motion for a new trial.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The facts adduced upon the trial of this case in the court below presented a jury question. The court properly so held by refusing to defendant the general affirmative charge requested in writing.

Appellant was convicted for distilling, etc., prohibited liquors and for the possession of a still to be used for that purpose. No erroneous ruling of the court appears, and under all the facts 'we will not disturb the action of the court in overruling motion for a new trial.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 So. 924, 23 Ala. App. 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-state-alactapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack