Knight v. State
This text of 92 So. 3d 723 (Knight v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After Remand from The Alabama Supreme Court.
In Ex parte Knight, 92 So.3d 717 (Ala.2011), the Alabama Supreme Court re[724]*724versed this Court’s judgment affirming the circuit court’s summary denial of James Sheridan Knight’s motion for reconsideration of his sentence pursuant to § 13A-5-9.1, Ala.Code 1975.2 The Supreme Court determined that a July 25, 2007, administrative order of the Montgomery Circuit Court did not constitute a valid judicial appointment under § 13A-5-9.1 because the order allowed the circuit clerk to exercise discretion in assigning motions for sentence reconsideration to various judges. Specifically, the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that the selection of-the circuit judge to hear Knight’s motion was not the act of the presiding judge as required by the statute and, consequently, that circuit judge did not have authority to decide Knight’s motion. Therefore, the Supreme Court reversed our judgment and remanded the case to this Court.
In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision, we reverse the summary denial of Knight’s motion for reconsideration of his sentence and remand the case to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 So. 3d 723, 2012 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 25, 2012 WL 976833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-state-alacrimapp-2012.