Knight v. Selinger
This text of 56 A.D.2d 910 (Knight v. Selinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In anegligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 23, 1976, which is in favor of defendant and against him, upon a jury verdict. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict for defendant (see Olsen v Chase Manhattan Bank, 10 AD2d 539, 544, affd 9 NY2d 829). We have considered plaintiff’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin and Mollen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 A.D.2d 910, 392 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-selinger-nyappdiv-1977.