Knight v. . Rothschild

New York Court of Appeals

Knight v. . Rothschild

97 N.E. 1107, 204 N.Y. 628, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 853

New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 30, 1912·Published

Opinion

Order of Appellate Division modified so as to strike therefrom the judgment of affirmance on the appeal of plaintiff and also the provision for the recovery of costs *629 of appeal" against defendant; and defendant having been permitted to withdraw his appeal from so much of the order as directed a new trial, the appeal from that portion of the order of the Appellate Division is dismissed, without costs of this appeal to either party; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of Appellate Division modified so as to strike therefrom the judgment of affirmance on the appeal of plaintiff and also the provision for the recovery of costs *629 of appeal" against defendant; and defendant having been permitted to withdraw his appeal from so much of the order as directed a new trial, the appeal from that portion of the order of the Appellate Division is dismissed, without costs of this appeal to either party; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.

Knight v. . Rothschild, 97 N.E. 1107, 204 N.Y. 628, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 853 (N.Y. 1912).

Pincite

97 N.E. 1107 (Knight v. . Rothschild) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.