Knight v. Paul E. Flato, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Knight v. Paul E. Flato, Inc.

246 A.D. 790

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 790 (Knight v. Paul E. Flato, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knight v. Paul E. Flato, Inc., 246 A.D. 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, as resettled, denying plaintiff’s motion for a stay of trial of two Municipal Court actions and for consolidation of said actions with this action, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, upon condition that plaintiff within five days after service of order furnish a surety company bond to defendant in the sum of $1,500 to secure payment of any judgment which defendant may recover, and upon the further condition that plaintiff file a consent to go to trial at the commencement of the February term, and to grant to defendant the right to open and close the case. If these conditions are not complied with within the time specified the order will be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, as resettled, denying plaintiff’s motion for a stay of trial of two Municipal Court actions and for consolidation of said actions with this action, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, upon condition that plaintiff within five days after service of order furnish a surety company bond to defendant in the sum of $1,500 to secure payment of any judgment which defendant may recover, and upon the further condition that plaintiff file a consent to go to trial at the commencement of the February term, and to grant to defendant the right to open and close the case. If these conditions are not complied with within the time specified the order will be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-paul-e-flato-inc-nyappdiv-1935.