Knight v. Parish Nationl Bank

457 So. 2d 1219, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 9739
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 9, 1984·No. No. 83 CA 1067·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The question before this Court is whether a divorced husband can sue his judgment creditor and the sheriff1 for the homestead exemption portion of funds derived from seizing and selling under a writ of fieri facias, a tract of land which formed a part of the community property between him and his divorced wife, where she and the children,2 but not the former husband, were living on the property at the time of the seizure and sale, and she had duly executed a waiver of the homestead exemption.

We hold that under the circumstances of this case only the former wife was entitled to the homestead exemption under the law, and she alone was the person who could waive the homestead exemption, which she did.

The statute, LSA-R.S. 20:1,3 exempts only the “bona fide homestead.” This property was the “bona fide homestead” of Mrs. Knight, not of Mr. Knight. Under the facts presented in this case, Mrs. Knight, as the head of the family residing with her children on the property had the right and [1220]*1220authority, pursuant to LSA-R.S. 20:1(D),4 to waive the homestead exemption. For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed at plaintiff-appellant’s costs.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight v. Parish Nationl Bank, 457 So. 2d 1219, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 9739 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

457 So. 2d 1219 (Knight v. Parish Nationl Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chase Home Finance, L.L.C. v. Davis
1 So. 3d 643 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2008)
DeMayo v. Chames
934 So. 2d 548 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)