Knight v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Texas

Knight v. Miller

446 S.W.2d 887, 1969 Tex. App. LEXIS 2633

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 31, 1969

DocketNo. 17059

StatusPublished

This text of 446 S.W.2d 887 (Knight v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knight v. Miller, 446 S.W.2d 887, 1969 Tex. App. LEXIS 2633 (Tex. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

RENFRO, Justice.

Suit was brought by Raymond H. Knight against Thelma Boydston Miller in which plaintiff asked for specific performance of a contract under which defendant had agreed to sell to plaintiff three acres of land in Denton County.

Defendant moved for dismissal of the suit because (1) the description of the land was [888]*888vague, general, indefinite and impossible of definite ascertainment, and (2) under provisions of Sec. 26.01, V.A.T.S. Business and Commerce Code, V.T.C.A., was, as a matter of law, insufficient to support or allege a cause of action.

The trial court, finding that the description of the real estate did not comply with the minimum requirements of Sec. 26.01, sustained defendant’s motion and entered judgment dismissing the suit.

Plaintiff appealed to this Court.

The plaintiff has not by point or points of error complained of any error committed against him in the trial court.

Fundamental error is not apparent of record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI