Knight v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 4, 2007·No. 2006-3427·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-3427

JAMES H. KNIGHT,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent,

Michael A. Moulis, Moulis & Associates, P.A., of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, argued for petitioner.

Sara B. Rearden, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were B. Chad Bungard, General Counsel, Rosa M. Koppel, Deputy General Counsel and Jeffrey Gauger, Acting Associate General Counsel.

Appealed from: United States Merit Systems Protection Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-3427

Respondent.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

in CASE NO(S). CH0752050704-I-1

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURIE, SCHALL, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: December 4, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2007).

Knight v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Knight v. Merit Systems Protection Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.