Knight v. Landis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Knight v. Landis

75 S.E. 834, 11 Ga. App. 536, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 97

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 27, 1912

Docket3690

StatusPublished

This text of 75 S.E. 834 (Knight v. Landis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knight v. Landis, 75 S.E. 834, 11 Ga. App. 536, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 97 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. Where the tenure of office is only collaterally involved, the statement by a witness that he was president of a named corpora, tion was not objectionable on the ground that the minutes of the corporation, showing his election, constituted higher and better evidence of the fact.

2. The material questions presented by the present writ of error are controlled, adversely to the plaintiff in error, by the ruling of this court in Sheffield v. Johnson County Savings Bank, 2 Ga. App. 221 (58 S. E. 386). Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

1. Where the tenure of office is only collaterally involved, the statement by a witness that he was president of a named corpora, tion was not objectionable on the ground that the minutes of the corporation, showing his election, constituted higher and better evidence of the fact.

2. The material questions presented by the present writ of error are controlled, adversely to the plaintiff in error, by the ruling of this court in Sheffield v. Johnson County Savings Bank, 2 Ga. App. 221 (58 S. E. 386). Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 S.E. 834, 11 Ga. App. 536, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-landis-gactapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack