Knight v. Lancaster

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided August 19, 1998·No. 01A01-9711-CH-00643·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT NASHVILLE

NOBLE NEAL KNIGHT, a non compos FILED

mentis next friend and guardian, August 19, 1998 FRED KNIGHT, Cecil W. Crowson

Plaintiff-Appellee, Appellate Court Clerk

Marion Chancery No. 4712

Vs. C.A. No. 01A01-9711-CH-00643

JAMES LANCASTER, Defendant and MADGE BOGGILD,

Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER

Defendant-Appellant Madge Boggild has filed a petition to rehear, and from our re-

review of the record we have determined that the petition to rehear is not well taken.

Accordingly, the petition to rehear is denied.

W. FRANK CRAWFORD, PRESIDING JUDGE, W.S.

DAVID R. FARMER, JUDGE

HOLLY KIRBY LILLARD, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight v. Lancaster, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Knight v. Lancaster (Knight v. Lancaster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.