Knight v. Lancaster
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT NASHVILLE ______________________________________________
NOBLE NEAL KNIGHT, a non compos FILED mentis next friend and guardian, August 19, 1998 FRED KNIGHT, Cecil W. Crowson Plaintiff-Appellee, Appellate Court Clerk Marion Chancery No. 4712 Vs. C.A. No. 01A01-9711-CH-00643
JAMES LANCASTER, Defendant and MADGE BOGGILD,
Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ____________________________________________________________________________
Defendant-Appellant Madge Boggild has filed a petition to rehear, and from our re-
review of the record we have determined that the petition to rehear is not well taken.
Accordingly, the petition to rehear is denied.
_________________________________ W. FRANK CRAWFORD, PRESIDING JUDGE, W.S.
__________________________________ DAVID R. FARMER, JUDGE
__________________________________ HOLLY KIRBY LILLARD, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Knight v. Lancaster (Knight v. Lancaster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.