Knight v. Lancaster

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Knight v. Lancaster

DecidedAugust 19, 1998

Docket01A01-9711-CH-00643

StatusPublished

This text of Knight v. Lancaster (Knight v. Lancaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knight v. Lancaster, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT NASHVILLE ______________________________________________

NOBLE NEAL KNIGHT, a non compos FILED mentis next friend and guardian, August 19, 1998 FRED KNIGHT, Cecil W. Crowson Plaintiff-Appellee, Appellate Court Clerk Marion Chancery No. 4712 Vs. C.A. No. 01A01-9711-CH-00643

JAMES LANCASTER, Defendant and MADGE BOGGILD,

Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER ____________________________________________________________________________

Defendant-Appellant Madge Boggild has filed a petition to rehear, and from our re-

review of the record we have determined that the petition to rehear is not well taken.

Accordingly, the petition to rehear is denied.

_________________________________ W. FRANK CRAWFORD, PRESIDING JUDGE, W.S.

__________________________________ DAVID R. FARMER, JUDGE

__________________________________ HOLLY KIRBY LILLARD, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI