Knight v. Lancaster
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT NASHVILLE
NOBLE NEAL KNIGHT, a non compos FILED
mentis next friend and guardian, August 19, 1998 FRED KNIGHT, Cecil W. Crowson
Plaintiff-Appellee, Appellate Court Clerk
Marion Chancery No. 4712
Vs. C.A. No. 01A01-9711-CH-00643
JAMES LANCASTER, Defendant and MADGE BOGGILD,
Defendant-Appellant.
ORDER
Defendant-Appellant Madge Boggild has filed a petition to rehear, and from our re-
review of the record we have determined that the petition to rehear is not well taken.
Accordingly, the petition to rehear is denied.
W. FRANK CRAWFORD, PRESIDING JUDGE, W.S.
DAVID R. FARMER, JUDGE
HOLLY KIRBY LILLARD, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Knight v. Lancaster (Knight v. Lancaster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.