Knight v. Lancaster

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided August 19, 1998·No. 01A01-9711-CH-00643·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT NASHVILLE ______________________________________________

NOBLE NEAL KNIGHT, a non compos FILED mentis next friend and guardian, August 19, 1998 FRED KNIGHT, Cecil W. Crowson Plaintiff-Appellee, Appellate Court Clerk Marion Chancery No. 4712 Vs. C.A. No. 01A01-9711-CH-00643

JAMES LANCASTER, Defendant and MADGE BOGGILD,

Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER ____________________________________________________________________________

Defendant-Appellant Madge Boggild has filed a petition to rehear, and from our re-

review of the record we have determined that the petition to rehear is not well taken.

Accordingly, the petition to rehear is denied.

_________________________________ W. FRANK CRAWFORD, PRESIDING JUDGE, W.S.

__________________________________ DAVID R. FARMER, JUDGE

__________________________________ HOLLY KIRBY LILLARD, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight v. Lancaster, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Knight v. Lancaster (Knight v. Lancaster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.