Knight v. Knight
251 A.D. 702, 296 N.Y.S. 997, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7034
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. The Special Term was justified in denying the defendant’s motion for leave to serve an amended answer as a matter of discretion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Knight v. Knight, 251 A.D. 702, 296 N.Y.S. 997, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7034 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
251 A.D. 702 (Knight v. Knight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.