Knight v. Kelso

Idaho Court of Appeals

Knight v. Kelso

704 P.2d 965, 109 Idaho 61, 1985 Ida. App. LEXIS 698

CourtIdaho Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 1, 1985

DocketNo. 14540

StatusPublished

This text of 704 P.2d 965 (Knight v. Kelso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knight v. Kelso, 704 P.2d 965, 109 Idaho 61, 1985 Ida. App. LEXIS 698 (Idaho Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a suit for attorney malpractice. In a companion appeal, Knight v. Kelso, 109 Idaho 56, 704 P.2d 960 (Ct.App.1985), we discuss the circumstances surrounding the dispute between the attorney, Starr Kelso, and his clients, Randall and Mary Knight. In that appeal, we uphold the trial court’s directive that the Knights’ claim of malpractice be litigated in that case rather than here.

Accordingly, we affirm the order dismissing the malpractice complaint in the present action. Such dismissal is, of course, without prejudice to the Knights’ right to pursue the claim in the companion case, as directed by the district court. No costs or attorney fees awarded in this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a suit for attorney malpractice. In a companion appeal, Knight v. Kelso, 109 Idaho 56, 704 P.2d 960 (Ct.App.1985), we discuss the circumstances surrounding the dispute between the attorney, Starr Kelso, and his clients, Randall and Mary Knight. In that appeal, we uphold the trial court’s directive that the Knights’ claim of malpractice be litigated in that case rather than here.

Accordingly, we affirm the order dismissing the malpractice complaint in the present action. Such dismissal is, of course, without prejudice to the Knights’ right to pursue the claim in the companion case, as directed by the district court. No costs or attorney fees awarded in this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

704 P.2d 965, 109 Idaho 61, 1985 Ida. App. LEXIS 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-kelso-idahoctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack