Knight v. Kelly

345 S.E.2d 490, 289 S.C. 318, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 381
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJune 16, 1986
Docket22572
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 345 S.E.2d 490 (Knight v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knight v. Kelly, 345 S.E.2d 490, 289 S.C. 318, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 381 (S.C. 1986).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellant contends that the circuit court erred in failing to afford him a jury trial, a trial de novo, or the opportunity to introduce further evidence in his appeal from the probate court.

This Court adopts the opinion issued by the Court of Appeals in Martin v. Skinner, 286 S. C. 527, 335 S. E. (2d) 252 (Ct. App. 1985) in toto. That case is dis-positive of the issues raised on this appeal.

Affirmed.

Ness, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Sant ex rel. Will & Testament of Collins v. Smith
393 S.E.2d 174 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 S.E.2d 490, 289 S.C. 318, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-kelly-sc-1986.