Knight v. Forbes

103 S.E. 725, 25 Ga. App. 490, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 30
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1920·No. 10823·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The proof in this case failing to sustain the allegations of the petition, the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Luke, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight v. Forbes, 103 S.E. 725, 25 Ga. App. 490, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 30 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

103 S.E. 725 (Knight v. Forbes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Oglethorpe v. Brooks
125 S.E. 600 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)