Knight v. Forbes

103 S.E. 725, 25 Ga. App. 490, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 30
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 15, 1920
Docket10823
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 725 (Knight v. Forbes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knight v. Forbes, 103 S.E. 725, 25 Ga. App. 490, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 30 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The proof in this case failing to sustain the allegations of the petition, the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Luke, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of Oglethorpe v. Brooks
125 S.E. 600 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 725, 25 Ga. App. 490, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-forbes-gactapp-1920.