Knight v. Episcopal Church of the United States

Fourth Circuit

Knight v. Episcopal Church of the United States

402 F. App'x 787

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 24, 2010

DocketNo. 10-1947

StatusPublished

This text of 402 F. App'x 787 (Knight v. Episcopal Church of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knight v. Episcopal Church of the United States, 402 F. App'x 787 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mildred C. Knight and Bobby Knight, III, appeal the district court’s orders denying their motion to reconsider the order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing their purported civil rights action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Knight v. Episcopal Church of the United States, No. 2:10-cv-00516-DCN, 2010 WL 3009308 (D.S.C. July 26, 2010 & Aug. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mildred C. Knight and Bobby Knight, III, appeal the district court’s orders denying their motion to reconsider the order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing their purported civil rights action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Knight v. Episcopal Church of the United States, No. 2:10-cv-00516-DCN, 2010 WL 3009308 (D.S.C. July 26, 2010 & Aug. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

402 F. App'x 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-episcopal-church-of-the-united-states-ca4-2010.