Knight v. Edwards

276 So. 2d 499, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6934
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 25, 1973·No. No. 72-1225·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner was aggrieved by an interlocutory decision in a civil action such as was formally cognizable in equity and brought his petition for writ of certiorari under Rule 4.5(c), Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A. Petitioner misconceived his appellate remedy, the proper answer being an interlocutory appeal, under Rule 4.2, Florida Appellate Rules. We are not permitted to transpose and treat his petition as an appeal. Bartow Growers Processing Corp. v. Florida Growers Processing Cooperative, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 165; Schneider v. Manheimer, Fla.App.1964, 170 So.2d 75. Sapp v. La Violette, Fla.App.1970, 242 So.2d 483. See generally Florida Civil Practice After Trial, § 17.17, et seq.

Dismissed.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight v. Edwards, 276 So. 2d 499, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6934 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

276 So. 2d 499 (Knight v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roper v. Roper
336 So. 2d 654 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)