Knight v. Edwards

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Knight v. Edwards

276 So. 2d 499, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6934

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 25, 1973

DocketNo. 72-1225

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 So. 2d 499 (Knight v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knight v. Edwards, 276 So. 2d 499, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6934 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner was aggrieved by an interlocutory decision in a civil action such as was formally cognizable in equity and brought his petition for writ of certiorari under Rule 4.5(c), Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A. Petitioner misconceived his appellate remedy, the proper answer being an interlocutory appeal, under Rule 4.2, Florida Appellate Rules. We are not permitted to transpose and treat his petition as an appeal. Bartow Growers Processing Corp. v. Florida Growers Processing Cooperative, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 165; Schneider v. Manheimer, Fla.App.1964, 170 So.2d 75. Sapp v. La Violette, Fla.App.1970, 242 So.2d 483. See generally Florida Civil Practice After Trial, § 17.17, et seq.

Dismissed.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner was aggrieved by an interlocutory decision in a civil action such as was formally cognizable in equity and brought his petition for writ of certiorari under Rule 4.5(c), Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A. Petitioner misconceived his appellate remedy, the proper answer being an interlocutory appeal, under Rule 4.2, Florida Appellate Rules. We are not permitted to transpose and treat his petition as an appeal. Bartow Growers Processing Corp. v. Florida Growers Processing Cooperative, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 165; Schneider v. Manheimer, Fla.App.1964, 170 So.2d 75. Sapp v. La Violette, Fla.App.1970, 242 So.2d 483. See generally Florida Civil Practice After Trial, § 17.17, et seq.

Dismissed.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 So. 2d 499, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-edwards-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack