Knight v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

207 N.W. 505, 114 Neb. 387, 1926 Neb. LEXIS 14
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 18, 1926
DocketNo. 23543
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 207 N.W. 505 (Knight v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knight v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad, 207 N.W. 505, 114 Neb. 387, 1926 Neb. LEXIS 14 (Neb. 1926).

Opinion

Eberly, J.

This is a companion case of McCaffrey Bros. Co. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., ante, p. 382, and is an appeal from a [388]*388judgment based upon the identical facts as' appear in the last named case. The cases were tried as one in the district court and separate judgments were entered after the receipt of all the evidence. They were combined and submitted on the same basis in this court. The rules of law applicable to .the controversy in this action are the same as are set forth in the case of McCaffrey Bros. Co. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., supra.

It follows therefore that the judgment of the district eourt must be, and is,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 N.W. 505, 114 Neb. 387, 1926 Neb. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-chicago-burlington-quincy-railroad-neb-1926.