Knight-Ridder Broadcasting Inc. v. Greenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Knight-Ridder Broadcasting Inc. v. Greenberg

126 A.D.2d 834, 510 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41969

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D.2d 834 (Knight-Ridder Broadcasting Inc. v. Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knight-Ridder Broadcasting Inc. v. Greenberg, 126 A.D.2d 834, 510 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was [835]*835considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion, ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did this court err in reversing the Supreme Court’s order and remitting the matter to the Supreme Court for an in-camera inspection of the taped interview with Donald Bent to determine what portions, if any, of such interview, were conducted confidentially?” Main, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was [835]*835considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion, ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did this court err in reversing the Supreme Court’s order and remitting the matter to the Supreme Court for an in-camera inspection of the taped interview with Donald Bent to determine what portions, if any, of such interview, were conducted confidentially?” Main, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D.2d 834, 510 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-ridder-broadcasting-inc-v-greenberg-nyappdiv-1987.