Knight Oil Tools, Inc. v. Rippy Oil Company, Rippy Interest LLC, the Genecov Group, Inc., and John D. Proctor
This text of Knight Oil Tools, Inc. v. Rippy Oil Company, Rippy Interest LLC, the Genecov Group, Inc., and John D. Proctor (Knight Oil Tools, Inc. v. Rippy Oil Company, Rippy Interest LLC, the Genecov Group, Inc., and John D. Proctor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-18-00284-CV
KNIGHT OIL TOOLS, INC., Appellant v.
RIPPY OIL COMPANY, RIPPY INTEREST LLC, THE GENECOV GROUP, INC., AND JOHN D. PROCTOR, Appellees
From the 278th District Court Leon County, Texas Trial Court No. O-10-498
ABATEMENT ORDER
On April 11, 2019, the parties filed an Agreed Motion to Correct Reporter’s Record.
The parties request this Court to correct the reporter’s record to include deposition
excerpts which were played to the jury, but were not completely transcribed by the court
reporter. The motion indicates that the testimony of certain witnesses was presented to
the jury by video deposition excerpts. Each party prepared a printed report from the deposition transcript consisting of the testimony that had been presented and those
reports were provided to the court reporter. Those reports were not included as exhibits
or made a part of the appellate record. The parties provided the transcripts to this Court
and ask this Court to make the transcripts a part of the appellate record.
Rule 34.6 (e) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides for the correction
of inaccuracies in the reporter’s record. If the dispute arises after the reporter’s record
has been filed in the appellate court, that court may submit the dispute to the trial court
for resolution. TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6 (e) (3). We conclude that this appeal should be abated
and that the trial court should hold a hearing to address this issue and, if so determined,
receive the transcripts as an exhibit to be filed in a supplemental reporter’s record.
The hearing shall be held within 21 days from the date of this order, and a
supplemental reporter’s record, if any, shall be filed no later than 14 days after the date
of the hearing.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Order issued and filed April 24, 2019
Knight v. Rippy Oil Company, et al. Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Knight Oil Tools, Inc. v. Rippy Oil Company, Rippy Interest LLC, the Genecov Group, Inc., and John D. Proctor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-oil-tools-inc-v-rippy-oil-company-rippy-interest-llc-the-texapp-2019.