KNIGHT, ODIS, PEOPLE v

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 2011
DocketKA 09-02476
StatusPublished

This text of KNIGHT, ODIS, PEOPLE v (KNIGHT, ODIS, PEOPLE v) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
KNIGHT, ODIS, PEOPLE v, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 396 KA 09-02476 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND GREEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ODIS KNIGHT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

RONALD C. VALENTINE, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LYONS (MARY P. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

RICHARD M. HEALY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LYONS (CHRISTOPHER BOKELMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Wayne County Court (John B. Nesbitt, J.), rendered March 5, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the first degree, robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by striking Wayne County Court’s oral directive that defendant never again enter Wayne County or travel within 50 miles of the victim’s home and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30 [2]) and robbery in the first degree (§ 160.15 [3]). As the People correctly concede, County Court erred in orally modifying the order of protection issued at the time of sentencing. We therefore modify the judgment by striking those oral modifications. The written order of protection remains in effect. We decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to adjudicate defendant a youthful offender (see People v Martinez, 55 AD3d 1334, lv denied 11 NY3d 927; People v Bosse, 23 AD3d 1063, lv denied 6 NY3d 809). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bosse
23 A.D.3d 1063 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Martinez
55 A.D.3d 1334 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
KNIGHT, ODIS, PEOPLE v, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-odis-people-v-nyappdiv-2011.