Knight ex rel. Kerr v. Miami-Dade County

548 F. App'x 607
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 2013
DocketNo. 12-14633
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 548 F. App'x 607 (Knight ex rel. Kerr v. Miami-Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knight ex rel. Kerr v. Miami-Dade County, 548 F. App'x 607 (11th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The issue in this case is whether the district court erred in denying summary judgment based on qualified immunity to Officers Ryan Robinson and Michael Mendez of the Miami-Dade Police Department. The officers assert that the court should have disregarded Latasha Cure’s deposition testimony under the sham affidavit rule and then granted summary judgment to them based on their qualified immunity defense. Assuming that the sham affidavit rule applies in these kind of circumstances, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to disregard Latasha Cure’s deposition as a sham, and the district court did not err in finding that there was a genuine issue of material fact requiring that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied. We therefore affirm the denial of summary judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knight Ex Rel. Kerr v. Miami-Dade County
856 F.3d 795 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
548 F. App'x 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-ex-rel-kerr-v-miami-dade-county-ca11-2013.