Knight, Et Ux. v. Raffel

158 So. 501, 117 Fla. 830
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 2, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 158 So. 501 (Knight, Et Ux. v. Raffel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knight, Et Ux. v. Raffel, 158 So. 501, 117 Fla. 830 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal here is from final decree of foreclosure in favor of complainant of a mortgage securing note in the sum of $8,000.00.

The only real question presented is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to warrant the findings of the Master and the findings and decree of the Chancellor based thereon.

There is ample substantial evidence to support the findings and decree.

The evidence shows in short that appellant for a consideration of $10,000.00, being cash in the sum of $2,000.00 and four notes for $2,000.00 each secured by a mortgage which is the subject of this foreclosure, was allowed to retain property covered by the mortgage which he had agreed to convey to appellee for an agreed consideration of $30,-000.00, as a part payment for other property conveyed by appellee to appellant, and which property agreed to be conveyed by appellant, appellee has agreed to convey to another for $20,000.00.

Therefore, the decree should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 So. 501, 117 Fla. 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-et-ux-v-raffel-fla-1935.