Kniffin v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kniffin v. Miller

235 A.D. 659

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 659 (Kniffin v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kniffin v. Miller, 235 A.D. 659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and facts and verdict reinstated, with costs. We are of the opinion that there was sufficient evidence to justify the charge made by the trial justice in respect to the plaintiff leaving the side of the street when the signal light was against him, and this was substantiaEy conceded by the counsel for the plaintiff in the subsequent requests, and that no other error of law or fact is found to justify the exercise of the power of the trial court to set aside the verdict. AE concur. Present1— Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and facts and verdict reinstated, with costs. We are of the opinion that there was sufficient evidence to justify the charge made by the trial justice in respect to the plaintiff leaving the side of the street when the signal light was against him, and this was substantiaEy conceded by the counsel for the plaintiff in the subsequent requests, and that no other error of law or fact is found to justify the exercise of the power of the trial court to set aside the verdict. AE concur. Present1— Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kniffin-v-miller-nyappdiv-1932.