Kniffen v. State

749 S.W.2d 11, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 374, 1988 WL 13070
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 1988·No. No. 53077·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-movant, James A. Kniffen, appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm. Rule 84-16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kniffen v. State, 749 S.W.2d 11, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 374, 1988 WL 13070 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).

749 S.W.2d 11 (Kniffen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.