Kniebes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kniebes v. State

391 So. 2d 743, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17913

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 24, 1980

DocketNo. 80-1103

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 391 So. 2d 743 (Kniebes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kniebes v. State, 391 So. 2d 743, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17913 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

HERSEY, Judge.

Appellant, convicted of trafficking in cocaine in violation of Section 893.135 Fla. Stat. (1979), appeals on several grounds, two of which we believe have merit.

The record discloses a factual pattern that might well sustain the conclusion that a conflict of interest may have prevented appellant from receiving effective assistance of counsel at the trial level. It would be inappropriate for this Court to substitute its factual finding for that of the trial court. Nonetheless, we believe the trial court should be given the opportunity to revisit this issue in light of the holding of Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 100 S.Ct. 1708, 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980) with reference to privately retained counsel.

We also observe that appellant’s situation falls within the mandatory ambit of the youthful offender statute, § 958.04(2)(a)(b), Florida Statutes (1979). See Barnhill v. State, 393 So.2d 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

We therefore reverse and remand with instructions that the trial court consider the allegations concerning counsel’s conflict of interest, in view of Cuyler v. Sullivan, supra, and further, if appellant is to be sentenced, it is to be as a youthful offender pursuant to the statute.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

GLICKSTEIN, J., and LEONARD RIVKIND, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HERSEY, Judge.

Appellant, convicted of trafficking in cocaine in violation of Section 893.135 Fla. Stat. (1979), appeals on several grounds, two of which we believe have merit.

The record discloses a factual pattern that might well sustain the conclusion that a conflict of interest may have prevented appellant from receiving effective assistance of counsel at the trial level. It would be inappropriate for this Court to substitute its factual finding for that of the trial court. Nonetheless, we believe the trial court should be given the opportunity to revisit this issue in light of the holding of Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 100 S.Ct. 1708, 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980) with reference to privately retained counsel.

We also observe that appellant’s situation falls within the mandatory ambit of the youthful offender statute, § 958.04(2)(a)(b), Florida Statutes (1979). See Barnhill v. State, 393 So.2d 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

We therefore reverse and remand with instructions that the trial court consider the allegations concerning counsel’s conflict of interest, in view of Cuyler v. Sullivan, supra, and further, if appellant is to be sentenced, it is to be as a youthful offender pursuant to the statute.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

GLICKSTEIN, J., and LEONARD RIVKIND, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

391 So. 2d 743, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kniebes-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack