Knickerbocker Vil., Inc. v. Lexington Ins. Co.

2019 NY Slip Op 9360
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 26, 2019
Docket10637 653665/15
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 9360 (Knickerbocker Vil., Inc. v. Lexington Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knickerbocker Vil., Inc. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 9360 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Knickerbocker Vil., Inc. v Lexington Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 09360)
Knickerbocker Vil., Inc. v Lexington Ins. Co.
2019 NY Slip Op 09360
Decided on December 26, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 26, 2019
Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Oing, Singh, González, JJ.

10637 653665/15

[*1] Knickerbocker Village, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Lexington Insurance Company, et al., Defendants-Respondents.


Weg & Myers, P.C., New York (Joshua L. Mallin of counsel), for appellant.

Fleischner Potash LLP, New York (Gil M. Coogler of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Tanya R. Kennedy, J.), entered on March 28, 2019, which denied plaintiff's request for information about defendant's handling of its other insureds' losses resulting from Superstorm Sandy, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied plaintiff's request to compel disclosure of information about defendants' handling of its other insureds' losses resulting from Superstorm Sandy. The requested discovery is not material and necessary to the prosecution of the claims in this action (see CPLR 3101[a]; Gray v Tri-State Consumer Ins. Company, 157 AD3d 938, 940-941 [2d Dept 2018]; Diaz v City of New York, 140 AD3d 826 [2d Dept 2016]).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 26, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Diaz v. City of New York
140 A.D.3d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 9360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knickerbocker-vil-inc-v-lexington-ins-co-nyappdiv-2019.