Knickerbocker v. Olsen

225 N.E.2d 590, 352 Mass. 768
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 31, 1967·Published

Opinion

These actions of tort are brought by the plaintiff against the objection of her guardian, who was'appointed by reason of her mental illness. G. L. c. 201, § 6 (as amended through St. 1956, c. 314, § 2). A judge in the Superior Court in each case by order sustained answers in abatement and also ordered to be vacated the appearance of the plaintiff’s attorney. Ride 20 of the Superior Court (1954). The plaintiff appealed. The appeals do not lie. There is no “order decisive of the case founded upon matter of law apparent on the record.” G. L. c. 231, § 96. Summers v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. 301 Mass. 167, 168-169.

Appeals dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knickerbocker v. Olsen, 225 N.E.2d 590, 352 Mass. 768 (Mass. 1967).

225 N.E.2d 590 (Knickerbocker v. Olsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Summers v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
16 N.E.2d 670 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1938)