Knickerbocker v. Knickerbocker
97 N.W. 1117, 135 Mich. 102, 1903 Mich. LEXIS 729
Opinion
Bill for divorce. In this case we are convinced that the complainant has made out her case, and that the defense has failed to show adultery on her part, or to sustain the acts charged. An extended opinion has been prepared, in which the testimony has been discussed in extenso; but, as the case turns solely upon a question of fact, we think no good purpose would be served by printing in the Reports an opinion of 20 or 30 pages, which could not serve as a precedent in any future case.
Decree is reversed, with costs to complainant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Knickerbocker v. Knickerbocker, 97 N.W. 1117, 135 Mich. 102, 1903 Mich. LEXIS 729 (Mich. 1903).
97 N.W. 1117 (Knickerbocker v. Knickerbocker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Heaton v. Heaton
152 N.W. 938 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1915)
Philpott v. Kirkpatrick
137 N.W. 232 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)
Luick v. Arends
132 N.W. 353 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1911)
Knickerbocker v. Worthing
101 N.W. 540 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1904)
White v. White
97 N.W. 681 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1903)